Showing posts with label Our Lady. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Our Lady. Show all posts

Saturday, September 9, 2017

Parisian Sequence for Our Lady's Nativity

From the 1738 Paris Missal comes this Sequence for Our Lady's Nativity:
1. Gaudii primordium,
Et salutis nuntium
Diem nostræ canimus.
2. Quæ dat hora Virginem,
Spondet Deum hominem:
En venit quem quærimus. 
3. Quam in matrem eligit,
Hujus ortum dirigit,
Deus omnis gratiæ.
4. Domum quam inhabitet,
Mox e qua nos visitet
Ornat Sol justitiæ. 
5. Quot micat luminibus,
Suis Deus usibus,
Quod vas fingit gloriæ!
6. Quot latent miracula!
Fiet hæc nubecula
In vim magnam pluviæ. 
7. Benedicta Filia,
Tota plena gratia,
Tota sine macula.
8. Cæli quod jam habitas,
Pande nobis semitas,
Prece, Virgo, sedula. 
9. Iram promeruimus,
Christe; pacem petimus:
Hanc da matris precibus.
10. Ut in nobis maneas,
Corda nostra præbeas
Pura culpis omnibus.
Amen. (Alleluja.)
And, thanks to Google Translate taking a French translation from the Schola Sainte Cecile's website, here is an English version:
We celebrate the day that begins our joy, the day that announces our salvation.
The moment that gives birth to the Virgin Mary promises us a God-man: the one we are expecting will appear.
The God of all grace, who chose Mary for her mother, presides over her birth: he overwhelms her with his blessings.
The Sun of Justice decorates with his gifts the house he wishes to inhabit, and from which he comes to make himself visible to men.
With what glory must shine this precious vessel, which God takes care to form for himself!
What prodigies are here confined! It is a little cloud which rises, but which will yield for us a fertile and abundant rain.
Holy and blessed daughter, filled with the graces of the Lord, pure and spotless virgin:
Pray for us unceasingly, O holy Virgin, and open to us by this means the entrance of heaven, where you dwell.
We have deserved thine anger, O Jesus; we sigh after our reconciliation: grant it at the prayers of thy Mother.
So that we may be a dwelling worthy of thee, O Lord, deign to purify our hearts from all sin. Amen. Alleluia. 

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Humilitas

Whilst some Traddies whined on about His Holiness not wearing the Papal mozetta for his first appearance on the loggia last evening Rome time, early this morning in Rome residents and schoolchildren near St Mary Major's were surprised to see the new Pope arrive to pray there (just as he had promised in his first speech), accompanied by a very small entourage.

The Holy Father prayed for half an hour before the altar of the Virgin Mary, doubtless imploring her aid as Salus populi Romani.

Does not this say something?

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Sub tuum

I actually know better the slightly different Dominican chant recension (which omits the words gloriosa et), but find this - the Roman version - quite singable.

What an excellent prayer!  As all men know, this is the oldest known prayer to Our Lady, about 1750 years old in fact; the English version I know, based upon the Latin, is:

We fly to thy patronage, O Holy Mother of God: despise not our petitions in our necessities, but ever deliver us from all dangers, O glorious and blessed Virgin.  

Of course, there is an ambiguity in the Latin: does semper go with libera nos, or with Virgo - in other words, do we pray "ever deliver us" or do we pray to the "ever Virgin"?  So long as this is kept in mind, I feel that either is perfectly reasonable; and I normally say this prayer in Latin anyway.  (Some forms of the Latin prayer include the word nostris after necessitatibus, but this is not necessary for the sense.)

The oldest version of this prayer is found in a Coptic manuscript, in Greek; the prayer continues in use to-day in the Byzantine Rite, as an apolytikion at the end of Vespers in Great Lent, thus:

Ὑπὸ τὴν σὴν εὐσπλαγχνίαν,
καταφεύγομεν, Θεοτόκε.
Τὰς ἡμῶν ἱκεσίας,
μὴ παρίδῃς ἐν περιστάσει,
ἀλλ᾽ ἐκ κινδύνων λύτρωσαι ἡμᾶς,
μόνη Ἁγνή, μόνη εὐλογημένη.

Beneath your compassion,
We take refuge, O Mother of God:
do not despise our petitions in time of trouble:
but rescue us from dangers,
only pure, only blessed one.

(Thanks to Wikipedia for this and its translation!)

Note that the Latin adds sancta ("holy"), cunctis ("all"), and semper ("always/ever") - all customary amplifications of euchological texts - while it renders εὐσπλαγχνίαν (goodness of heart) as præsidium ("assistance/defence/stronghold"; englished as "patronage"), and paraphrases μόνη Ἁγνή (only Pure/Chaste) as Virgo; perhaps "only" suggested semper ("always") - it appears that gloriosa et is indeed a later amplification of the original.  My dictionary explicitly equates κίνδυνος with periculum, but suggests that λύτρωσαι would be better rendered as "ransom/redeem" - redime.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Amare Nescivi

St Philip will be pleased and highly amused: not only was he not even mentioned at Mass (which appeared to be a Votive of Our Lady, seeing as the Gospel read was of Our Lord's commendation of His Mother to St John at the Crucifixion), in line with his dictum "to love being unknown"; but I arrived and found it to be a - Novus Ordo children's Mass! (I suspect St Philip Neri would have perversely liked the Novus Ordo: he found the sacred solemnities of the Mass as celebrated in his day so moving that he had to distract himself with jokes in the sacristy and walking up and down before the altar lest he go into ecstasy and float off into the air! There is little fear of the aptly-named Ordinary Form causing such episodes - unless of course one can attend the sort of sumptuous liturgies that the English Oratorians have managed to render.)

I should explain: having driven around Dunedin trying to get to the Cathedral, I arrived at that handsome Gothic edifice, and found (after genuflecting to the Bl Sacrament in the side chapel) that Mass on weekdays is elsewhere, round the back of the Catheral... I ended up scurrying through the diocesan offices, up staircases and through passageways, before ending up in the chapel to the rear of St Dominic's Priory - built for Dominican sisters last century: there I found a teacher shepherding very tiny primary school students, who were attending Mass (as well as what I assume were the usual adult Mass-goers). By the time I had found my way there, the priest was about to read the Gospel.

Fr John Harrison (he introduced himself to me after Mass; he knows a priest friend of mine, Fr Greg, O.P.) then gave the sermon by questioning the children about who the Beloved Disciple was, and about how our mothers care for each of us - and then very beautifully explained how Mary is our mother and looks after us from heaven, and that we should turn to her in all our troubles, that she may intercede for us with God the Father, God the Son (who is her Son Jesus) and God the Holy Ghost. Despite this being a children's Mass - and I gritted my teeth and very nearly fled the chapel when I came in and realized what I could be in for - all was conducted juxta rubricas, even Fr's careful explanations of certain parts of the Mass (as provided for in the GIRM). I notice that the latest minor alterations to the rubrics have not yet reached New Zealand: no one stood until after replying to the Orate fratres, nor did anyone pay their due reverence before receiving the Sacrament (though doubtlessly they did so in their hearts).

The Eucharistic Prayer, being one of those "for children" was actually quite decent: it certainly talked of the Mass as a sacrifice, though when speaking of the fruits of communion it did use the term "meal" which I do greatly dislike as overly secular and reductionist: surely "feast" or "banquet" is more fitting? I did ask Fr after Mass about the Our Father - I was all ready to launch into it, but found no one saying "...who art in heaven"! So much for the one Mass even in English! Apparently this modern version of the Lord's Prayer crept in in N.Z. since its use during John Paul II's visit in 1986 (he was, after all, not terribly liturgically minded). I find it most ironic that I can say the Pater noster without difficulty, yet couldn't join in this very prayer in my own native tongue. How rude.

Mass ended - again in a manner surprising to an Australian - with the children (too young even to receive Communion) all singing a hymn to Our Lady in Maori: they were the majority of them Pakeha (British or European), and yet they all did so! This I must say I applaud, since after all the Maori are a good percentage of New Zealanders and their language is a recognized treasure; and the words of the hymn (see below) were excellent in sentiment. From my perspective, how inconceivable that any Australian congregation, aside from some in a former mission station in the far desert, would or could ever sing anything in any Aboriginal language!

Ka waiata ki a Maria


Ka waiata ki a Maria
Hine i whakaae
Whakameatia mai
Hei whare tangata
Hine purotu, hine ngakau
Hine rangimarie
Ko te whaea, ko te whaea
O te ao (o te ao).

I sing to Mary, our mother,
The one who heard God's call,
The call to be the mother
Of Our Lord (of us all)
Gentle woman, loving mother,
Our Lady Queen of Peace.
I sing to Mary,
the mother of Our Lord (of us all).

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Altarpiece

Thanks to AllPosters.com I've just purchased a nice reproduction of Carlo Maratti's The Virgin Mary Appearing to St Philip Neri - ideal for an altarpiece...

(I feel the proprietors won't mind if I post a copy here of the image concerned; I think of it as offering them some free advertising.)

St Philip, vested in red for Mass, signifying his devotion to the Holy Ghost, kneels in ecstasy as he beholds Our Lady and Child - Our Lady, seated as befits the Mother of Our Lord and therefore the Queen of heaven, being handed a triple-flowered lily (signifying her perpetual virginity) by a helpful angel, and bearing on her lap her beloved Son and adorèd God, the Infant Jesus, cynosure of all eyes and Desire of all hearts, Who is being worshipped by twelve putti, the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul (respectively bearing the keys of the kingdom and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God) - with whom lowly St Philip is ranked as the third Apostle of Rome - and St Mary Magdalen (marked out by the jar of ointment she bears as once she did en route to the Empty Tomb) on whose eve he was born and whom he regarded as a special patroness; Philip and his server (note the Oratorian collar) join in the adoration of the Divine Lamb.

[But stay! Is not St Philip gesturing with the one hand to the Madonna and Child, and with his other to... we who behold this sacred image? Is he recommending us to one another?]

I conjecture that the moment illustrated is perhaps the genuflexion at the words Et Verbum caro factum est, during the reading of the Last Gospel - note the position of the Missal at the Gospel end of the altar, and moreover straight on, not tilted (recall that the side altar cards were not yet prescribed during his life, I recall); and the snuffer for the altar candles lies in readiness on the side step (alternatively, given St Philip's habit of having the candles snuffed out at the Communion of his private Mass, which he drew out to a great length, perhaps this is meant to represent what then occurred, known only to God - but at that part of the liturgy his server customarily withdrew).

The Madonna indeed appeared to St Philip at least twice: once, in a dream, to warn him that the construction of the Chiesa Nuova faced disaster had she not interposed (when the building site was inspected, a great roof beam was found totally unsupported at one end - a deficiency hurriedly rectified by the amazed and grateful workmen!); and again, toward the end of his life, to cure him of a serious illness (he was raised in ecstasy, appeared to embrace someone unseen while weeping tears of joy, and before he returned to his senses asked if those attending had not seen Our Lady - realizing he'd alone seen the apparition, he was filled with that confusion which is the mark of true humility).

As a true "Child of Mary", good St Philip ever had a most tender and filial devotion to the Mother of God, and used to recommend the short prayer "Virgin Mary, Mother of God, pray to Jesus for me," or even simply "Virgin Mother," for - again, in Newman's words - "he said that in those two words all possible praises of Mary are contained."

Saturday, December 27, 2008

Iconographic Theme

St John Evangelist had many great and unique privileges: he alone of the Apostles was a virgin, was for this grace as for his other aspects of saintliness especially beloved of the Lord, and was commended by Christ to His Mother the Virgin as a pure soul worthy to substitute in a manner even for her Onlybegotten Child, standing on our behalf as representative of the whole of redeemed mankind.  

He was miraculously delivered from martyrdom, endured exile on the isle of Patmos, and slept at last in the Lord in extreme old age at Ephesus, having established and ruled the churches of Asia Minor in perfect charity and love.  Mediævals even speculated that the Beloved Disciple, like the Mother of God, was assumed bodily into heaven.

Whatever rationalists and critics may assert, the tradition is still respected by the Church that he composed the Fourth Gospel, three epistles, and the Apocalypse, shewing him to be an evangelist without par of the Word made flesh: hence he is both John the Evangelist and John the Theologian, or John the Divine, given his piercing insight into the secrets of heaven and of Christ's Divinity: his symbol therefore is a soaring eagle.

I have always liked the image of St John as Our Lady's chaplain - for did he not take her unto his home (St John xix, 27), and thereafter would he not have, as a priest of the New Testament, celebrated for her the Divine Mysteries of her Son?  It is piously held that Our Lady had this privilege from the Lord, that as He took flesh from her flesh, so after the Resurrection she daily received Him in sacramental Communion, and - miracle! - His Real Presence within her ceased not from Communion to Communion.  Again, sceptics may scoff, but potuit, docuit, ergo fecit...

Therefore, I'm thinking of commissioning from Christopher, an artist of my acquaintance whom I saw at the Adelaide ordinations, a painting according to a design that's been for years on my mind: in mediæval style, a portrayal of Our Lady attending at the Mass of St John, as the Evangelist offers up the tremendous Sacrifice - she would be shewn at a prie-dieu, no doubt with a prayerbook, he at the altar in the usual pose as seen in the well-known Mass of St Gregory.  The image would be not anachronistic, but a symbolic depiction of the truth that the Blessed Virgin would have been houselled by St John.

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

24th December: Mass in the Morning

Serving Mass at Carmel again this Christmas brings back happy memories - for I've done so for many years, on and off.  Fr is obviously a recollected priest, given that he not only recited the vesting prayers before Mass, and at Mass joins his hands juxta rubricas (something most priests, being lazy, don't bother with), but conjoins his thumb and forefinger from the Consecration to the ablutions (as Fr Mannes does).  If this is the Novus Ordo, I must say I don't mind it...   

I enquired after Mass, would he like me to bring wine as well as water for the ablutions?  Yes, he replied.  This all reminds me of what was said of the more conservative clergy when the 1549 B.C.P. was brought in: that they kept as much of the old ceremonial as they dared, and celebrated at side altars "Holy Communion of Our Lady" or "of the Apostles" just as if they were still offering up their accustomed Votives.  (BTW, "Our Lady" is, or rather ought be, a  title for the Blessed Virgin perfectly acceptable even to Anglicans, since the Book of Common Prayer, in its table of "Lessons Proper for Holy-Days", refers to the "Annunciation of our Lady" - let Protestants take note!)


In any event, Fr preached inter alia on the sense of eager expectation that Advent ought have enkindled in our hearts, that we might arise and awake early as the Prophet tells us in the lessons from Isaias read in the Office, and be as it were bursting with longing for Christmas and the Christ Child to come - he adduced how little children love getting up early, especially at Christmas, not always to the delight of their parents (amusement), and caused more titters from the sisters when he praised them for doing the same so joyfully! - for we needs must have that childlike sense of wonder and awe at even the natural order, at the rising sun at dawn, at each new day, given to us gratis, that helps feed our even greater amaze at beholding things supernatural, above all God's great Gift of Himself incarnate for us at Christmas.

Saturday, December 6, 2008

Our Blessed Lady / Blessed Mother

An intriguing cultural difference between Australian Catholics on the one hand, and American Catholics on the other has caught my attention...

I customarily speak of the Blessed Virgin Mary as "Our Lady" or in more formal words as "Our Blessed Lady", just as I refer to Our Lord Jesus Christ as "Our Lord" or, more formally, "Our Blessed Lord"; for I exceedingly dislike, as irreverent and tending to impiety, the modern obsession with dumbing down our forms of address, and daring to speak casually of "Mary" and "Jesus" - at the most, I refer to Him as "Christ" rather than to so freely use the Holy Name, and with St Clement Mary Hofbauer, when I hear mention made of "Mary", I am tempted to ask to which Mary reference is being made.

Apparently Americans refer to the Blessed Virgin Mary far more often as "Our Blessed Mother" or "the Blessed Mother" - which is an expression I wouldn't use at all, not that it isn't a very nice and true one, but simply it sounds odd and foreign, as if I spoke of the "Holy Heart" of Jesus, and not of the "Sacred Heart".  Do Americans use "Our Lady" as well, or does that sound very English and quaint to them?

Is this just my peculiarity, or is this a real difference in Catholic phraseology between Australia (together with other Commonwealth countries, such as Britain) and the USA?

Comments, please!

Friday, November 7, 2008

Maria Mediatrix

It's been too long since I have lauded Our Blessed Lady, or posted any theological jottings, so here is the essay I once wrote for a course I did at the John Paul II Institute in Melbourne, a course entitled "Vatican II and John Paul II", seeing the latter, being Supreme Pontiff after all, as the privileged interpreter of the former (a mantle since then taken up by his gentle and venerable successor, now gloriously reigning)...

I hasten to add that in this essay I presented a much more moderate view than I was expecting, so to speak, as I had perforce to restrict myself within the purview of the teachings of Vatican II and John Paul II regarding Our Lady as Mediatrix, rather than freely expatiating on my own (and nowadays I would certainly present more background doctrine from the Fathers and Doctors and piety of all ages, particularly noting the robust and forthright usage of the terms μεσιτεία and μεσῖτις - "mediation" and "mediatress" - for Our Lady in Byzantine liturgical texts); make of my essay what you will, but please critique it freely.

******


The Blessed Virgin Mary as Mediatrix
according to Vatican II and John Paul II

εἷς γὰρ Θεός, εἷς καὶ μεσίτης Θεοῦ καὶ ἀνθρώπων, ἄνθρωπος Χριστὸς Ἰησοῦς.
(1 Tim 2:5)

Bonum diffusivum sui.
(St Thomas Aquinas)

Introduction

Can it be said that the Blessed Virgin Mary is Mediatrix, and what would it mean? Properly speaking, there is only one unique Mediator: “there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Tim 2:5). According to Aquinas, a mediator is one who brings together and unites those between whom he mediates. To unite humanity to God belongs to Christ, since he is the one through whom the world is reconciled to God (cf. 2 Cor 5:19) by his death, giving himself as a ransom for all (cf. 1 Tim 2:6). However, there is nothing to prevent calling other persons mediators between God and mankind, insofar as in some way they cooperate in uniting the latter to the former, as for instance do priests through administering the sacraments. They can share in this work because the good is diffusive of itself, permitting men to share in God’s own power in due measure. 

In Catholic tradition Our Lady has been designated as Mediatrix, and even as Mediatrix of all graces – a Mass and Office of Our Lady as invoked under this title being granted to Belgium (and latterly to other dioceses that wished for it) in 1921. This latter term has not been used by the Magisterium since before Vatican II. Instead, insisting on Christ as the one Mediator, the Papacy under John Paul II has continued to develop (as will be seen below) the teaching of the Council that Mary is indeed Mediatrix, but her mediation derives from, is totally subordinate to and in union with that of Jesus Christ her Son, and is a consequence of her divine maternity and concern for all the children that she has been given by God – for her Son is the firstborn of many brethren (Rom 8:29), and to each of them applies the solemn charge, “Woman this is your son” (Jn 19:26).

Mary as Mediatrix «sub Ipso et cum Ipso» —Lumen gentium, nn.60-62

There was conflict at the Council between a minority who wished to proclaim Mary as Mediatrix of all graces and another group who wished to avoid the title altogether. According to the former group of bishops (some 382 had asked for this title to be defined when consulted prior to the Council ), Mary assists at each and every dispensation of divine grace to the world. They relied upon preconciliar Papal teachings; the axiom of St Bernard, to the effect that every grace is conferred through Mary, had been used in the writings of Popes Bl Pius IX, Leo XIII, St Pius X, Pius XII, and Bl John XXIII. However, the majority of the Fathers felt that the time was not right for defining this doctrine, as they felt it insufficiently established in the Church, not yet come to theological maturity as a definable dogma rather than as a theological opinion, and not very suitable ecumenically.

The compromise achieved was to mention the title of Mediatrix but situate the teaching within the context of the one mediation of Christ, in which Mary and all intercessors share. Christ’s grace raises all the faithful to a share in his divine life, and enables them to share in his theandric activity of saving and redeeming. Above all persons, this is true of Mary. Her historical connection with his work of redemption is prolonged by her motherly care for all her spiritual children in Christ.

The Council decreed that discussion of the mediatorial role of Mary must not be separated from the truth that Christ her Son is the one Mediator, as Scripture teaches: “for there is one God and one mediator of God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself a redemption for all” (1 Tim. 2,5-6). Her mediation does not detract from that of Christ, but can only exist as a consequence of its overflowing power, and only exists by the divine will. Neither does it detract from “the immediate union of the faithful with Christ” but of its nature serves to strengthen it.

In paragraph 61 of Lumen gentium, the Fathers of the Council show how the mediation of Mary is manifested in the economy of salvation. (This may be compared with the Rahnerian principle that the economic Trinity is the immanent Trinity, or rather reveals it.) By her predestination, which was one with the eternal decree of the Incarnation of the Logos, she was made to be Virgin Mother of God the Redeemer. She fulfilled her task and in an unique manner cooperated (singulari prorsus modo cooperata est) by her faith, hope and charity in his salvific work, united with him as his associate (socia) and united with him in her compassion (compatiens) at his sacrifice on Calvary. They conclude with the rich statement “Wherefore she is our mother in the order of grace”. As Ephesus declared her Mother of God, Vatican II declared Mary spiritual mother of the faithful. In her motherhood consists her mediation. The text of this paragraph is partially dependent on a draft text circulated at Vatican I, which spoke of Mary as “bringing forth Christ our God and Lord became to us a mother of grace and… was made mother of all the living, nor does she cease by her powerful intercession to win us gifts of eternal salvation”.

Our Lady’s mediatorial function is wholly subordinate to that of Jesus, who, as perfect God and perfect man, is priest and therefore mediator, bringing all prayer and oblation of men to God and from God bringing all graces and mercy to men. She shares in his mediation by her constant intercession, “bringing us the gifts of eternal salvation”. Her maternal charity, her love for her Son, urges her to care for all his brethren. It is for this reason that she is invoked under such titles as Advocate, Auxiliatrix (Helper), Adjutrix (Benefactress), and Mediatrix. But they are not to be understood except as wholly subordinated to the title of Christ as the one Mediator, for to that truth they add nor subtract nothing.

The reason why our Lady can be given such titles in truth, while Christ’s unique mediation is reaffirmed, is that the good is diffusive of itself, communicated in various ways to all created things, and God delights in working through secondary causes, in such wise that the primary cause of any act and its secondary causes are likewise true and proper causes of that act. Therefore, while Christ is the one priest of the New Testament, this does not exclude but rather makes possible the share of all the faithful in the common priesthood, by reason of their baptism into Christ, and likewise it allows for the ministerial priesthood to exist, sacramentally representing the one sacrifice of Christ, applying the power of the Cross and showing forth its power. Similarly, the one mediation of Christ is not exclusive, but of its fulness allows creatures to share in its power of reconciling and uniting God and man through prayer and grace. Mary’s role as mediatrix is a form of maternal help and assistance for all the faithful to be joined more perfectly to the Mediator and Redeemer.

Maternal Mediation — Redemptoris Mater

In his 1987 Encyclical Redemptoris Mater, John Paul II treated of the question of the mediation of the Blessed Virgin Mary (in nn.21-22,38-41,44-45). Throughout this compendium of Marian doctrine, he is anxious to adhere to and expound the conciliar teaching on Our Lady. To this end, in the sections dealing with her mediation, the Pope constantly quotes the relevant paragraphs of Lumen gentium (nn.60-62), always returning to them after expanding upon them.

He begins to teach the faithful about Mary’s mediation by explicating her maternal intervention at Cana (Jn 2:1-11), which he reads as an exemplar of her unfailing interventions on behalf of humanity, showing that her mediation is “in the nature of intercession: Mary intercedes for mankind”. She wishes that her Son’s messianic power be active to save and help. This intervention is maternal, because she does not act as an intermediary, a mediatrix, as an outsider, but precisely as mother of her Son, for as his mother she has the right and duty to speak to him on behalf of all who want, need, and suffer – for she is their mother also. This new motherhood is a spiritual one, not according to the flesh. The Synoptic Gospels (cf. Lk 8:19-21; 11:27-28; Mt 12:46-50; Mk 3:31-35) have Jesus asserting that motherhood according to the flesh is contrasted with membership in the kingdom of God according to the Spirit; Cana shows that the maternity of Mary is spiritual, for she has maternal solicitude for all. 

This is the first indication in the Gospel of the maternal concern of Mary for all: as the Council asserted, she became “a mother to us in the order of grace”. John Paul then proceeds to quote Lumen gentium, n.60, reiterating that the mediation of Mary flows from that of Christ, the one Mediator (cf. 1 Tim 2:5), and neither diminishes nor augments it, but rather manifests its power. The third part of Redemptoris Mater is entitled “Maternal Mediation”, and this enunciates the view of the Pope that Mary’s mediation is a corollary of her role as Mother of God. It stems from her motherhood; its character is maternal; thus it is special, extraordinary, distinguished from the mediation of all other creatures, all of whom share in various ways in the one mediation of Christ, just as she does. Having been divinely elected as the Mother of God, she is made “our mother in the order of grace,” as Vatican II proclaimed.

Mary’s motherhood “in the order of grace” parallels the natural union of mother and child: her relationship to each Christian is a bond analogous to the loving relationship between persons characteristic of such a union. This relationship is between individuals, which is why Mary’s maternal love for all is indicated by the words of Christ to his Mother, that she should see the beloved disciple as her son (Jn 19:26): she is mother of all Christians as individuals; each is uniquely beloved. From this stems her maternal mediation in the Spirit, interceding for each of her children.

As Mother of the Mediator, she has given him his human nature, and it is as man that Christ is Mediator. Having accepted to become the Mother of the Incarnate Word, she from that moment shares in an unequalled manner in the one mediation between God and man of Jesus Christ the God-Man. Having been totally given to God in virginity, and understanding her acceptance of motherhood as a total donation of her person to the unfolding of the divine plan, she became both virgin and mother for ever: totally God’s, wholly committed to him, and wholly Christ’s. Thus she shared in his mediation in a unique manner, beginning at the Annunciation, giving the world its one Mediator. This is the fundamental origin of her mediation. Her honour and dignity as Mother of God is the highest state of relationship with God to which a creature can be lifted. Through her, God the Father gave his Son to men; through her, human nature was assumed into the Godhead. All this constituted her as mediatrix.

Furthermore, always cooperating with her Son in his work of salvation, even unto her unwavering stance at the foot of the Cross, her motherhood was ever being infused with perfect charity by the Spirit, becoming in union with Christ ever more desirous of the salvation of all. Being full of grace from the first moment of her existence, and thus preeminently redeemed, she above all others experienced in her integrity of soul and body the excellence of the redemption wrought by the Mediator, and so was most able to cooperate in his work, in a role of mediation subordinate to his own. She was therefore most fitted to be made by Christ “for all people their ‘mother in the order of grace’”.

Ever since the ascension of Christ, our Lady has been united in a singular way to his Church. She was there at its infancy, in a manner reliving the conception and birth of Christ by her assistance at the prayer of the apostles and disciples in the cenacle, and at the descent of the divine Spirit at Pentecost. As the Pope explains, her maternal self-giving to her Son was transferred to the Church, Christ’s mystical body; by her intercession she cooperated with his salvific work in his members. His paschal mystery won salvation for all, and so her share in his mediation had necessarily a universal dimension. It has also a universal dimension in time, for as the Council declared, even after her passing from this life, she did not cease to mediate for men. 

Our Lady is preeminent among the saints in her mediation, which is always ordered to and derived from the one mediation of her Son. As all the saints in heaven pray for us, so much the more does she intercede for us. As Pius XII defined, her corporeal assumption conforms her above all other creatures to her risen and ascended Son, and in perfection of body and soul in glory she continues her collaboration with him, acting as mediatrix until the end of time, when she will return with Christ and at his side perform a special motherly role as “mediatrix of mercy” for men at the Final Judgement. Being so utterly united to Christ, her mediation excels all others, serving the work of the one Mediator and so reigning puissantly with him (cui servire regnare est – whose service is perfect freedom).

General Audiences

On 13th December 1995, 30 years after the close of the Council, the Holy Father reflected on the teaching of Vatican II about the Mother of the Lord. He explained how it came to pass that this body of doctrine was incorporated into the document Lumen gentium on the Church. While some feared that her dignity and privileges and unique level of collaboration in the economy of salvation would be insufficiently emphasised by this, the material included in chapter 8 of that document “shows real doctrinal progress” and “the danger of reductionism… proved unfounded: Mary’s mission and privileges were amply reaffirmed: her cooperation in the divine plan of salvation was highlighted; the harmony of this cooperation with Christ’s unique mediation appeared were [sic; lege more] evident.” With regard to her title of Mediatrix, the Pope noted that the hesitation of some Fathers was overcome, and it was included alongside statements affirming her mediation in other terms, such as her motherhood in the order of grace and her unique cooperation in the work of bringing supernatural life to men.

In his catechesis on the Blessed Virgin Mary, which Pope John Paul II gave during 1997 at his General Audiences, he reflected on the mediation of Our Lady. He explained that “The heavenly Father… wanted to unite to the Redeemer’s intercession as a priest that of the Blessed Virgin as a mother.” Here the derivation of her role as Mediatrix from her status of Mother of Christ and Mother of the faithful is emphasised. Furthermore, he stated that “As maternal Mediatrix, Mary presents our desires and petitions to Christ, and transmits the divine gifts to us, interceding continually on our behalf.” This is a profound sentence, as it shows not merely Mary’s intercession for us, but her active obtaining and especially her transmission of grants of grace to all.

John Paul II gave his most extensive catechesis on Mary as Mediatrix on 1st October 1997. He elucidated the meaning of the term by quoting from Lumen gentium, n.62, affirming her as bringing to all the gifts of salvation by her intercession. He reiterated his earlier teaching in Redemptoris Mater, n.38, that her mediation is maternal in nature, deriving essentially from her divine motherhood and her consequent spiritual motherhood of the faithful as children of God and coheirs with Christ. It is therefore a unique type of mediation, and moreover uniquely efficacious. She cooperates in the spiritual rebirth of humanity, and thus can be termed “mother in the order of grace”. She is “our Mother” and thus our “Mediatrix”. Some Conciliar Fathers objected to the term, but not when it was rightly explained by the Council in reply as a fruit of her maternity.

Again he quoted at length from Lumen gentium, testifying that the term Mediatrix does not take anything from the perfection of the one Mediator, but rather manifests his power of mediation. Another aspect of the question was revealed by his exegesis of 1 Tim 2:1-6, when he pointed out that St Paul prefaces his assertion of Christ as the unique Mediator by calling for intercessions to be offered up for all, and therefore, as prayers are a form of mediation, he is calling for all to share more fully in the participated mediation of Christ, excluding only a pretended mediation that would seek to do without Christ. In his great love, God desires to share what he possesses, and this gives rise among other things to the possibility for creatures to share in the mediation his Son achieves. It is at the will of the Father that Mary as a sharer in Christ’s mediation is given to the world, and she receives from his mediation “all that his heart wishes to give mankind”.

At an earlier audience, he affirmed that Mary cooperated in the Redemption by being present during the Passion in her motherly role, collaborating “in obtaining the grace of salvation” in a unique manner, acting always in subordination to the work of Christ, but really cooperating with him. She did so in virtue of being Mother of God, having brought him forth, raised him, and assisted him even at his death, suffering beneath the Cross. There, as the New Eve and icon of the Church, she represents all redeemed humanity called to share in the work of applying the salvation won by Christ on Calvary to souls and bodies. She continues by her maternal intercession to cooperate in the work of salvation accomplished by the sacrifice of Christ. It is to be noted that the Supreme Pontiff, while freely using the term “cooperator” with regard to Mary, sedulously avoided the more controversial term “coredemptrix”, preferring the former, which he mentions as being already used by St Augustine.

In 1997, the Pope candidly spoke of how Marian devotion and teachings constitute an ecumenical stumbling block to Protestants, for they see her cooperation in salvation as belittling Christ as the one Mediator, and in fact contradicting the Scriptural assertion of this truth. He related how deepened study of the Scriptures and the writings of the Reformers has led to an approach of some Protestants toward Catholic positions on these questions. Her maternal intercession he invoked, and on her maternal solicitude for all he relied, to obtain of God the gift of completed unity in faith. This is because Christians can rely on the maternal intercession of Our Lady “for every kind of grace… they can count on her motherly intercession to receive from the Lord everything necessary for growing in the divine life and for attaining eternal salvation.”

At his General Audience of 12th January 2000, the Holy Father reaffirmed the inseparability of Mary’s mediation, rooted in Christ’s, and in no way apart from it or paralleling it. Her cooperation in salvation derives from his mediation, and is “the most sublime fruit of Christ’s mediation… essentially directed to bringing us into a more intimate and profound encounter with him”

Rosarium Virginis Mariæ

In 2002, in his Apostolic Letter on the Rosary, the Pope again spoke of the maternal care of Mary for us as manifested in her unwearying intercession, which is her mode of sharing in the mediation of the one Mediator, her Son Jesus Christ. He proceeds to quote St Louis de Montfort’s principle that, as perfection consists in being conformed to Christ, among all devotions that achieve this, the most efficacious is devotion to Mary, since she of all creatures is most conformed to him, and being more and more devoted to her will draw one necessarily closer and closer to him. Hence, her mediation shows forth the power of the one Mediator, and derives its efficacy from him, as the Council declared.

As first manifest at Cana, Mary’s maternal intercession greatly aids the Church. She points to Christ, the Way, and prayer to her indubitably leads to him, as she intercedes for us with him. To use a daring expression, she is “all-powerful by grace” — «omnipotens per gratiam» — for “her maternal intercession can obtain all things from the heart of her Son.” Thus the Holy Father enunciates the principle that Mary, most conformed of all to Jesus, and preeminently sharing in his mediation, is a mediatrix for the people of God, being a mother concerned for her children, knowing their true needs, and always obtaining for them what they really need, since she only asks for what she knows is in accord with God’s will, which he therefore readily dispenses.

Advocates of a New Marian Dogma — The Status Quæstionis

In the 1990’s renewed calls were made by some Marian devotees for Our Lady to be defined as Mediatrix of all graces, even as Coredemptrix. The Holy See requested the 1996 Mariological Congress to establish a commission to inquire if this were opportune; it reported in the negative. Since by deliberate act Vatican II avoided a definition of Mary as Mediatrix of all graces, despite calls for this from several hundred bishops prior to the Council, and since there seemed no substantial advance in ecclesiology, theology or exegesis that would support the proposal, it was felt that it remained a quæstio disputata. Our Lady was defined as having a universal motherhood in the order of grace in Lumen gentium, and her maternal mediation has been shown (as in Redemptoris Mater) to be consequent upon this; it was considered that the Magisterium had prudently spoken of all that was necessary in this area. The same view was expressed with regard to the other proposed term “Coredemptrix”, which the Magisterium had avoided in all its major pronouncements for 50 years, preferring instead the more uncontroversial term “cooperator in the work of salvation”. While the proposed terms of course can be understood in conformity with the faith, they would occasion disquiet and possible misunderstanding, particularly among the separated brethren. The Holy See, having received this report, has so far taken no action on the requests for the use of the two controverted terms, and it appears that none is likely.

Conclusion

The maternal intercession of the Blessed Virgin has been developed by Pope John Paul II as the heart of the understanding that she exercises a preeminent role (always ordered to and in union with her Son, the one Mediator and Redeemer) in mediating the graces of redemption to all. As she is Mother of God, she brought God’s gift of his Son, our salvation, into the world, and she collaborated with him all his life, even suffering in union with him as she endured a spiritual martyrdom at the foot of his Cross, whereon he offered himself to redeem the world. Being made mother of men in the order of grace by her dying Son, with maternal care she joined in continuous prayer with the infant Church and, assumed to heaven, she prays for the Church unceasingly. Therefore, she is rightly invoked as Mediatrix, from whom the pilgrim people of God may expect every assistance: she is as it were the throne of grace, to which all may turn for timely aid (cf. Heb 4:16), as she is pictured in art holding her Son, the source of all grace and salvation and life.

Bibliography

A NEW MARIAN DOGMA? Comment on Marian Academy's Declaration. Originally published in L'Osservatore Romano, Weekly Edition in English, 25 June 1997, 10.

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiæ.











O’Carroll, Michael. Theotokos: a theological encyclopedia of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Wilmington: M. Glazier, 1983.


Vorgrimler, Herbert (ed). Commentary on the Documents of Vatican II. Volume I. L. Adolphus, K. Smyth & R. Strachan, trans. New York & London: Burns Oates / Herder and Herder, 1966.